Keith Cozart Commented on group 4 DAN WARD lit review and group 1 Shellee Dawalt
Physical Learning
Physical Learning
Keith A. Cozart
Ball State University
September 26, 2015
Strategies
for Teaching Adults- EDAC 635
Professor
Bo Chang
Abstract
This paper focuses on Physical Learning within adult education. It
will describe notable definitions and aspects, identify major academic and physical
learning scholars contributing to its’ honing and importance, compare and contrast
a few of its many scopes and intersection with other learning theories and
identify its most compelling significance to adult learning. Thereafter the paper will draw conclusions and
implications based on the reviewed material.
Physical Learning
The process of Physical Learning can be alternatively
labeled or referenced in many different ways.
Kinesthetic, tactile, performance, motor, agility, coordination, muscle
and skill learning/training are a few alternate and accurate examples of
Physical Learning. While there is a
sparse amount of adult education literature aimed at learning that is physical (MacKeracher,
2004), the level of importance within education is paramount. Physical learning along with visual and
auditory stimuli fully connects our senses to learning new material more deeply. We rely on professionals who have honed skilled
skills acquired through physical learning.
To name a few, such service professions as surgeon, pilot, carpenter,
aerobic instructor, piano teacher, electrician and military person all require
high levels of training that is physical.
Physical learning takes place when students carry out
physical activities rather than listening to a lecture or watching
demonstrations. Dorothy MacKeracher
(2004, pp. 141) identifies what is involved in physical learning as follows:
·
coordinating body movement and orienting the
body in physical space (balance);
·
using tools and resources
effectively/efficiently;
·
improving muscular strength, flexibility,
body-image and cardiovascular conditioning;
·
learning new or improving physical skills
required for activities such as athletics, arts/crafts, music, home
improvement, workplace tasks;
·
maintaining and improving eye-hand coordination;
·
adaptation of existing skills based on life
changes such as aging, injury or disability.
Through her examples it is clear
that the scope of physical learning is extremely broad. With that in mind, the focus of this
literature review will aim at two areas of physical learning, Muscle Memory and
Motor Skills with specific attention paid to the following:
·
the acquisition of skilled motor performance;
·
shifts in task routines during the learning of a
motor skill;
·
the effects of practice schedules on learning
and performance;
·
muscle memory and its’ independence from the
nervous system.
General Themes of Reviews
The learning of a new or improved motor skill is a process. In developing motor function, enhanced
performance and muscle memory it has been proposed that such skills are
developed in two stages: fast learning, an initial in session improvement time
and slow learning, occurring after a break period of consolidating of new
material occurs and where-after delayed incremental gains in performance are
made with repetitive practice (Karni, Meyer, Rey-Hipolito, Jezzard, Adams,
Turner & Underleider, 1998). In
short, initially learn the overview, allow for a settling period then try again
repeatedly. In the world of percussion,
learning a new rhythm or drum technique aligns with the proposed stages. Muscle memory required to play percussive
instruments takes time and one of the most crucial events between stages is marked
by the consolidation time. Not only does
it allow for the settling of new material/coordination/rhythm, but also helps
alleviate frustration and fatigue. Adults
accumulate past experience and prior learning that is reflected upon during
time of consolidation (MacKeracher, 2004) validating the learning stage
process’s overall importance.
During the stages of motor skill learning, it is suggested by
Adi-Japha, Karni, Loewenschuss, Parnes and Vakil (2008) that a shift in task
routine occurs. They describe a transient phase during a motor skill
training process where after an initial increase in movement speed and a decrease
in variability, the learner experienced a significant increase in variability
along with no change in speed.
Thereafter the learner again showed decreased variability but demonstrated
more clear coherence. Stages in the
learning process whether procedural, sequential, experiential or other manner
directly affect learning efficiency and outcomes. The transient phase is another reminder for
the need of a settling period (consolidation time).
When learning any activity that requires muscle memory aimed
for highly skilled performance such as music, ceramics and carpentry, the need
for effective practice schedules and routines are important. These highly skilled motor functions are
extremely evident within sports and athletics.
For example, a major league baseball player at bat relies on his muscle
memory to swing at the ball. His body
knows what it feels like to swing the bat hence improving his chances at making
contact. The development of such skills takes a lot of time. Measuring the
effects of practice schedule on performance gain can help increase
results. A study on low verses
high-skill leveled tennis students show results that initial competency plays a
part in how practice schedules are established and implemented (Hebert, Landin
& Solmon, 1996). Low-skill level
students (beginner to intermediate) showed more improvement using a blocked
practice schedule verses that of alternating, whereas the higher skill level
students showed no significant gain from one schedule verses the other. This study may indicate the importance of
focused block learning for beginners that is more singular verses varied in the
initial process of learning a new motor function.
Muscle memory makes or breaks the competency of any
physically performed task requiring immediate reaction, results, speed, care,
intricacy, repetition or accuracy. So
what is muscle memory? Is it real? Can muscles drive behavior and action
independent from the nervous system? A
study by Liu and Jorgensen (2011) shows that while neuron input is likely
require for initial muscle reactions, but that muscles can fire without. This suggests that muscles retain movement
codes from previous repetition. While
the description is morbid, muscle memory can be demonstrated the be-heading of
a chicken. When a chicken is to be
butchered, often times the process is to remove the head. After decapitation, the body of the chicken
may run around, crow or even fly. All of
these happen without the input of the brain. This and other examples of muscle
movement acting independently from conscious brain function will be a primary
part of my research.
Beginners should expectedly require more blocked time spent
on specific processes, honing newly found skills with lots of repetition in
concentrated time frames. More advanced
student within motor function such as athletics are less effected by block
scheduling, making the option for separated schedule sessions warranted for
different skill levels.
Implications
Learning motor skills and muscle memory takes time. Any technically driven physical movement
requires practice and repetition.
Patience along the process is crucial for mental and physical wellbeing. Understanding the learning process helps
learning facilitators structure materials/sessions in ways that implement known
aids to the learning process. By
recognizing stages of fast learning followed by consolidation of new material
(settling period) and a return to slow learning, facilitators can ease
frustration, encourage the process and retain learners. Learners will experience stages in the
learning process. Recognizing as typical
or not can aid learners and facilitators become more effective and efficient
with their time together and practicing separately.
As research continues, it
becomes more apparent that muscle memory can happen without the specific firing
of neurons to stimulate muscle movement.
Through repetition, balanced practice routines and schedules that aim to
acknowledge staged learning patterns in learning new motor function,
facilitators can gear lesson plans to accommodate more productive and enjoyable
learning processes. In the end, the
learning process should not be a “races to the finish line.”
Reflections Highlights
The process of learning motor skills is complex and has
many facets. Based on the review of the
above literature the following observations are made:
1.
Motor skill learning is a stage process that is
best facilitated by a quick initial learning stage followed by a consolidation
time ending with a more slow/deep learning stage.
2.
Settling time between learning stages are
important.
3.
Beginners may need a different practice
structure than more advanced students.
4.
Muscle memory is mysterious but real and worthy
of much more research.
Reflecting the
Process
I rarely use collegiate databases to search for
article/journals. This process is new to
me. In the future I aim to get an
earlier start on collecting materials. I
found that most all references contained a large amount of vocabulary and
terminology that I did not know, using many scientific, mathematical, medical
and biological terms. When discussing
physical learning, I now understand more fully the amount of work I have to
perform based on my lack such vocabulary.
Lastly, the subject of muscle memory and physical learning is a
relatively untapped area of professional scholarship and development, while it
is something most everyone implements/practices on a regular basis. Muscle memory is something we all aspire to
improve upon without conscious effort.
From babies learning how to hold their bottle, kids learning the control
panel on a video game system, young adults learning to drive a car, to adults
working on home improvements, we just do it.
Physical
Learning
|
Main Themes
and Ideas
|
Application/Implications
|
The Acquisition
of Skilled Motor Performance
|
Fast and slow experience-driven changes
occur in primary motor cortex during learning process.
|
Skilled motor performance is
acquired in several stages: “fast” learning, an initial, within-session
improvement phase, followed by a period of consolidation of several hours
duration, and then “slow” learning, consisting of delayed, incremental gains
in performance emerging after continued practice.
|
A Shift in Task
Routine During the Learning of a Motor Skill
|
Describes a transient phase during training
on a movement sequence wherein, after an initial improvement in speed and
decrease in variability, individual participants’ performance showed a
significant increase in variability without change in mean performance speed.
|
Mindful attention paid to learning phases
can result in more effective and efficient learning process in the
acquisition of learning motor skills.
|
Practice Schedule
Effects on Learning
|
Measuring the effects of block verses
alternating practice schedules on skill building (tennis).
|
Manipulating practice routines in physical
skill building has a larger effect on low-skilled learners verses that of high-skilled. Block practice schedule showed increases
post-testing performance.
|
Muscle Memory
|
Can muscles really
drive behavior independently from the nervous system?
|
Understanding the nervous system and how
repetitive movement may become separated from the system (ie. becomes muscle
memory) shows evidence that such training can produce rhythmic muscle
contractions independent from neuronal input; indicating that muscle memory
may become much as the heart (muscle), involuntary.
|
References
Adi-Japha, E.,
Karni, A., Loewenschuss, I., Parnes, A., & Vakil, E., (2008). A shift in
task routines during the learning of a motor skill. Journal of experimental
psychology, 34(6), 1544-1551. doi: 10.1037/a0013217
Hebert, E.,
Landin, D., & Solmon, M. (1996). Practicing schedule effects on the
performance and learning of low and high skilled students. Research quarterly
for exercise and sport, 67(1), 52-58.
Jorgensen, E.,
& Liu, Q. (2011). Perspectives muscle memory. The Journal of Psychology, 589(4),
775-776.
Karni, A., Meyer,
G., Rey-Hipolitos, C., Jezzard, P., Adams, M., Turner, R. & Underleider,
L., (1998). The acquisition of skilled motor performance. National academy of
sciences, 95(3), 861-868.
MacKeracher, D.
(2004). Making sense of adult learning (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: University
of Toronto Press.
Merriam, S. B.,
Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2007). Learning in adulthood. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.